Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:09:10 -0400 From: "Drew Derbyshire" <avatar+pop3@kew.com> To: "David A. Panariti" <davep@who.net>, "Valentin Nechayev" <netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua> Cc: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Staying *really stable* in FreeBSD Message-ID: <006c01c0fac8$b55f0380$94cba8c0@xena> References: <200106212330.f5LNUn428853@baloo.ne.mediaone.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >>>>> "Valentin" == Valentin Nechayev <netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua> writes:
> It is not a matter of knowing it needs changing, it is a matter of
> changing it. Any time a procedure and be automated, it should be. It
> should be one's choice whether or not to use the automation, however.
> That's why I suggest a new tag rather than redefining an existing
> one.
.
.
.
> Given these two lists, Occam's razor would, I think, select the zero
> length list as the simpler one.
This assumes you can safely suddenly change releases with no real human
intervention (such as running mergemaster). Bad idea.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?006c01c0fac8$b55f0380$94cba8c0>