Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 17:37:51 -0800 From: "John Howie" <JHowie@msn.com> To: <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Fw: IDIOT Message-ID: <012f01c05e5b$fb9450d0$fd01a8c0@pacbell.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
To the cowardly subscriber of this list who sent me the following email from an anonymous account I'd like to point out that MSN stands for the Microsoft Network and does not mean that I work for, or endorse, Microsoft or its products. The fact that I use them is irrelevant. I posted the original email about the BindView advisory as it *clearly* affects FreeBSD, which I happen to run on an AlphaStation - but that, too, is irrelevant. I also won't point out the nearly two decades of UNIX experience that I have, or my kernel development experience. What I will say is that the coward who sent me this should stand up for his convictions and face me from a real email address and allow our peers to decide. To everyone else on the list, I apologize for taking up bandwidth. john... ----- Original Message ----- From: <aeonflux@microsoft.com> To: <JHowie@msn.com> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 4:59 PM Subject: IDIOT > Seriously dude. Your an idiot... this whole bindview is well > beyond something you can realistically hope to understand. > > All you see, or atleast you think you see is that it doens't effect > yoru dos, and effects others. Well lets talk about the counterless > other fucking millions of exploits that are windows specific. > > realistically speaking, msft is the biggest joke when it comes to security of > all time. > > And to be honest, windows2000 is not invulernable. It's only invulnerable > in regards to smb. Octopus style attacks (which bindview soo moronically > reinvented) have been around for a long time. Which is why most software > contains max connections. On other services like exchange, it's VERY > vulnerable. OFcourse I doubt you even understand what I'm talking about. > > The freebsd box in bindview's test had that option DISABLED. Meaning it wasn't > even a default install. This is yet another mindcraft, FIX... How sad, how > pathetic and how silly that an idiot such as yourself would even dare believe > something. Ahh I saw it online, in a microsoft mailing list, it MUST BE TRUE. > Cause windows2000 is soo well engineered, those 2000 chimps did such a good job > on the gui... oh yeah and those 3 guys working on the networking stuff... they > did good too! I GOT MY MCSE, LOOK AT ME!!!!!!!! > > Chances are your going to have to learn unix, if you wanna stay a systems > administrator. Thou I hear there are alot of helpdesk opennings. > > Face it... your a bitch... And a dumb one. > > MaxStartups is DEFAULT in freebsd release 4.0 within /etc/ssh/sshd_config > check your facts fuck. > > This is probably all over your head... So just sit happily in your little > world, resting assured in the fact that you dont have to learn anything new and > that your trival knowledge in a mickeymouse os will get you through life. > > Microsoft makes great os's for people who can't code, or are too stupid to ever > wanna understand what's happening under the broken ass gui. > > Oh that reminds me.... enjoy your next virus, you clearly deserve it. > > PS: this is one of those 'freebie' email accounts, dont > bother. > > --------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using Ottawa Online Mailbag. > http://www.ottawaonline.com > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?012f01c05e5b$fb9450d0$fd01a8c0>