Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:50:56 +0100 From: "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@freebie.atkielski.com> To: "Terry Lambert" <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: in-kernel HTTP Server for FreeBSD? Message-ID: <013401c1b91a$2a787470$0a00000a@atkielski.com> References: <20020217143343.41758.qmail@web21104.mail.yahoo.com> <xzp4rkgf7n7.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020217163045.GB90303@voi.aagh.net> <3C703089.AD03554B@mindspring.com> <018501c1b816$2a9cb970$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3C705564.E1EA2FDA@mindspring.com> <001c01c1b859$6ee18c80$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3C70E8B2.168D9F56@mindspring.com> <010101c1b87a$10707190$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3C7146A9.931F07EF@mindspring.com> <00a601c1b8ac$426670a0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3C71FEF8.BD18C88B@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry writes: > Normally, I do not take people apart in > public forums; consider yourself blessed. I always enjoy watching the attempt. > ] I've never cared for anything that must be > ] managed via HTTP. That's one reason why > ] I don't like IIS. > > #2: Anthony back tracking on his statement #1, > when caught in an overgeneralization. I never said that IIS requires a Web interface. IIS is managed with either a Web interface (which I don't like) or a GUI interface; I don't like IIS because it requires one of these, and the Web interface is heavily promoted (last time I looked). Your error is in drawing a connection between the two statements that isn't there. The antecedent of "that" was "web-based interfaces," not "things that must be managed via HTTP." > #3: Anthony admitting that he's aware of the > text interface he claims ignorance of n statement > #2, and denies the existance of in statement #1. Regedit is not a text-based interface to IIS, any more than vi is a text-based interface to Apache. It's a utility for modifying the registry, just as vi is a utility for modifying text files. > Evidence that this it was Anthony's implied > premise: I've already pointed out what wasn't my implication. The fact that your inference may disagree with my implication (if any) does not change this. > NEC disagreeing with Anthony: I've never been associated with NEC, at least not closely enough for them to be aware of anything I've written. > Without peer review, it's unlikely to be other > than opinion. Where does that leave your posts here? > Sir Issac Newton disagreeing with Anthony's > opinion on citations: The quote does not mention citations at all. > William of Occam disagreeing with the need to > return to first principles for everything: The quote does not mention first principles at all. > Ralph W. Sockman suggesting the need to > be able to learn from others, rather than > having to derive everythinbg yourself: The quote does not mention learning from others. You make the same order of unwarranted infererences from these citations as you do from my posts. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?013401c1b91a$2a787470$0a00000a>