Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:46:32 +0400
From:      Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
To:        Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [not completely SOLVED] acroread8 does not print any more
Message-ID:  <01698759@ipt.ru>
In-Reply-To: <49F6122A.7010704@gwdg.de> (Rainer Hurling's message of "Mon\, 27 Apr 2009 22\:14\:34 %2B0200")
References:  <49E98C97.9080602@gwdg.de> <10766735@ipt.ru> <49EB8968.3040004@gwdg.de> <91071496@serv3.int.kfs.ru> <49F4A031.5010500@gwdg.de> <67783565@ipt.ru> <49F6122A.7010704@gwdg.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> writes:
> On 27.04.2009 20:54 (UTC+2), Boris Samorodov wrote:
>> Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> writes:
>>
>>> A few days ago I reported about problems when I try to print from
>>> acroread8. For all but one of my systems the problem is solved now,
>>> see below.
>>>
>>> On one system I also totally cleaned up the linux emulator part and
>>> installed everything from the scratch. Now when I try to print I get
>>> the following message:
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Beim Drucken ist folgender Fehler aufgetreten...
>>> '/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/compat/libc.so.6: version
>>> GLIBC_2.2.4 required by /usr/local/Adobe/Reader8/DEU/
>>> Adobe/Reader8/Reader/intellinux/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 not
>>> defined'
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> libc.so.6 is from misc/compat6x. I am not able to detect any relevant
>>> differences between my systems.
>>>
>>> Is there any experience with this error message?
>>
>> Do you by any chance redefine default environment at that host
>> (i.e. path, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, etc.)? Can you see a difference
>> between kdump/linux_ktrace at this system and other systems?

Hm, that should be ktrace/linux_kdump...

> PATH is exactly the same on all systems, LD_LIBRARY_PATH etc. do not exist.
>
> Because I have no skills in tracing and debugging linux binaries I
> first have to read a lot. So this could take a while ...
>
> Am I right that devel/linux_kdump is the meant instead of kdump? And
> where do I find linux_ktrace?

Sorry, as I've just said ktrace should be from the base system.
Use it like "ktrace -i acroread" and then use linux_kdump.
You may get the package here:
ftp://ftp.ipt.ru/pub/linux/linux_kdump-1.5_2.tbz

> Thank you for answering,

NP & WBR
-- 
bsam



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01698759>