Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 23:37:16 -0500 From: "Scot W. Hetzel" <hetzels@westbend.net> To: "Bill Fumerola" <billf@chc-chimes.com> Cc: "FreeBSD-Ports" <FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: New Apache Ports Message-ID: <017001bfc539$bd69d2a0$8dfee0d1@westbend.net> References: <000f01bfc476$84fe3320$8dfee0d1@westbend.net> <20000523014316.G86725@jade.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: "Bill Fumerola" <billf@chc-chimes.com>
> On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 12:19:49AM -0500, Scot W. Hetzel wrote:
> To add to the previous comment, if you're going to be maintaining these,
> you should be committing them.. :->
>
The maintainership of the ports will stay with the current maintainers, only
that they would now be maintaining a module port instead of an
apache+module(s) port.
OLD Port New Port Maintainer
apache13-fp mod_frontpage scot
apache13-php3 mod_php3 dirk
apache13-php4 mod_php4 dirk
apache13-modssl mod_ssl ralf
Do these four ports need to be Repo copied in order to retain their
histories?
How long should they stay in the ports collection?
I submitted PR ports/18788 for the Apache ports collection.
I have added a CHANGES file to the apache ports collection that lists the
new, changed, and deleted files. I also looked at the PR database and found
10 PRs to be closed, 1 PR for a new module port (mod_auth_mysql), and 1 PR
to update apache13-fp (see CHANGES).
http://www.westbend.net/~hetzels/mod_apache.tgz
Scot
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?017001bfc539$bd69d2a0$8dfee0d1>