Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:52:31 +0200 From: Stefan <stefan@sf-net.com> To: =?UTF-8?Q?JINMEI_Tatuya_/_=E7=A5=9E=E6=98=8E=E9=81=94=E5=93=89?= <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: raw ip paket sendto error Message-ID: <03F2063D-0333-482C-ADD5-914D162E92C0@sf-net.com> In-Reply-To: <y7vslokk17u.wl%jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> References: <F8D644AB-76D0-49B6-A665-6B459A13F85D@sf-net.com> <y7vslokk17u.wl%jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I guess in this case getaddrinfo() tried to match the specified > "service" (port) with a raw socket (for which there is no notion of > "service"), and returned an error. Yes your right, I tried it without the port argument and it went fine. > > BTW, when I tried the same test on Solaris 10 and OpenBSD 3.6 (and > NetBSD 2.0.1 for that matter), I saw the same error. So, it seems the > current trend is to require a specific hint, and FreeBSD is not that > special. Hmm strange, I tried it again on OpenBSD 3.8 and there were no problems (i386). > Any suggestions for the second major problem? Best regards, Stefan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?03F2063D-0333-482C-ADD5-914D162E92C0>