Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:44:45 +0100 From: "Floris 'Tamama' van Gog" <floris@vangog.net> To: <freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: What could be wrong? very slow networking box Message-ID: <044e01c1984a$a1ce7ab0$1900a8c0@pc48> References: <004401c195fe$18378c90$9600000a@tamama> <20020105175108.A15190@cicely8.cicely.de> <20020105190829.A65181@freebie.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hoi, Well I guess it's just a slow box then. Still doesnt feel right that it can not route 7kb/sec (+- 200 udp packets) speedy enough not to notice there is a gateway in between. It's not a strange thing that it is not acting as my gateway at this point. Oh well I'll just try to get this linux emulation working and see if that Compaq compiler will do any good on it.. If not then I have a good box to test both running-speed and portability of my applications on :-) Thanks for the insight, Floris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wilko Bulte" <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: "Bernd Walter" <ticso@cicely8.cicely.de> Cc: "Floris 'Tamama' van Gog" <floris@vangog.net>; <freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 7:08 PM Subject: Re: What could be wrong? very slow networking box > On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 05:51:08PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 04:31:49PM +0100, Floris 'Tamama' van Gog wrote: > > > Holas, > > > > > > I think this is not right > > > > > > bloodscent# ping localhost > > > PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 48 data bytes > > > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.056 ms > > > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.700 ms > > > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.629 ms > > > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.678 ms > > > ^C > > > --- localhost ping statistics --- > > > 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss > > > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.629/0.766/1.056/0.170 ms > > > bloodscent# > > > > > > I can remember local loopbacks to be a 'tad' faster (0.008ms or > > > something like that) > > > > 8µS are only 1328 clock cycles on your 166MHz System. > > Memory bandwidth is much slower - hard to beleave. > > Maybe you had run Linux - AFAIK Linux ping show seconds... > > > > > Someone in #freebsd/undernet said it might be a hardware conflict > > > somehow. > > > > > > The machine is an AXPCI33 166Mhz with 64MB ram (well its in the dmesg > > > below). When I had natd and pptpclient going to get internet > > > connectivity for my LAN the connection got so slow that it was > > > noticable. A game, mostly udp data, 7.5kb/sec made the uptime stats go > > > to 1.54 1.30 1.20 (the gateway was only routing) > > > > This is on a PC164, which is much faster than an AXPpci33: > > ticso@cicely9> ping 127.0.0.1 > > PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 48 data bytes > > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.144 ms > > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.092 ms > > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.085 ms > > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.092 ms > > In case it makes anybody feel better, this is from a DS10, 466MHz/EV6 > > FreeBSD 4.5-PRERELEASE (DS10) #6: Fri Dec 21 15:12:41 CET 2001 > > ds10#ping localhost > PING localhost.wbnet (127.0.0.1): 48 data bytes > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.064 ms > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.033 ms > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.032 ms > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.036 ms > > > -- > | / o / /_ _ email: wilko@FreeBSD.org > |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, The Netherlands > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?044e01c1984a$a1ce7ab0$1900a8c0>