Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:27:46 -0600
From:      "Jim Fleming" <jfleming@anet.com>
To:        "Andre Oppermann" <oppermann@pipeline.ch>
Cc:        <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: RIFRAF Routing Changes for FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <049601c18332$513de9a0$1000a8c0@Unir.com>
References:  <041b01c1832d$9e1dbac0$1000a8c0@Unir.com> <3C178964.9115B289@pipeline.ch> <043b01c1832e$9d364b80$1000a8c0@Unir.com> <3C178F72.1ECBE9D@pipeline.ch>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It all boils down to fairness.
Which list do you think is more fair ?

The "toy" IPv4 Internet Early Experimentation Allocations ?
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
or
The Proof-of-Concept IPv8 Allocations ?
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt

Why would people pay for Address Space, when it is FREE ?

Jim Fleming
http://www.DOT-BIZ.com
http://www.in-addr.info
3:219 INFO


----- Original Message -----
From: "Andre Oppermann" <oppermann@pipeline.ch>
To: "Jim Fleming" <jfleming@anet.com>
Cc: <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: RIFRAF Routing Changes for FreeBSD


>
>  1. Learn how to articulate yourself
>
>  2. Read and understand the FreeBSD-arch list charter
>
>  3. Learn to state properly why you come here, what you'd like FreeBSD
>     to and why it should do so
>
>  4. Learn how to insert line breaks after 72 chars
>
> --
> Andre
>
> AO6-RIPE
>
>
> Jim Fleming wrote:
> >
> > RIFRAF Routing
> > RIFRAF (Remote Identification Field Random Action Filter) Routing is part of a phased approach to evolving from 32-bit IPv4
Internet
> > Addressing to larger address spaces. The RIFRAF feature in an IP stack, allows for remote access control of  the left-most
8-bits of
> > the normally 16-bit IPv4 Identification Field. The feature is part of the IPv8 PeaceKeeper/GateKeeper series. The feature allows
a
> > PeaceKeeper for a /16 prefix to remotely set StarGate values in a marking engine via simple ICMP+ extensions via the TOS field.
The
> > 4-bit StarGate values are rotated through an 8-bit field which is used in a 50/50 coin-toss marking process as packets are
processed
> > with the /16 prefix. Source and Destination StarGate marking is distinct, and all 65,536 /16 prefixes have two choices for the
> > source addresses and two choices for destination addresses. The random marking can be prevented by loading both StarGate values
to
> > be the same. The GateKeeper can be restored to legacy Identification Field marking by the PeaceKeeper. Packets marked via RIFRAF
can
> > be further routed or queued based on the marks which effectively add 4 bits to the 32-bit IPv4 legacy addresses. All of the
packets
> > pass transparently through legacy IPv4 equipment with no change. For legacy equipment not prepared to handle the markings, it
> > appears as the left 8-bits of the Identification Field. For each of the 256 marking values, an independent counter is maintained
for
> > the right-most 8-bits of the Identification Field. There is no API required or other user-level tools. Most modern "ping"
programs
> > can be used to set the bits. RIFRAF can exist silently inside of the stack and be totally controlled remotely via existing
> > connection(s) to the IPv4 private Intranets or the IPv4 Global Public Internet. Spoofing of the PeaceKeeper is possible and the
real
> > PeaceKeeper will receive the return reply, at which point the PeaceKeeper can restore the desired values. When RIFRAF is used in
> > conjunction with other routing devices and on an IPv16 network, these problems can be minimized. RIFRAF is mostly intended for
use
> > in extending the addressing of leaf-nodes, which generally are protected behind fire-walls and NAT devices, but can also be used
on
> > the IPv4 Global Public Internet to increase the addressing used by edge devices on /16 networks.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Andre Oppermann" <oppermann@pipeline.ch>
> > To: "Jim Fleming" <jfleming@anet.com>
> > Cc: <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:44 AM
> > Subject: Re: RIFRAF Routing Changes for FreeBSD
> >
> > >
> > > So?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andre
> > >
> > >
> > > Jim Fleming wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This may help...
> > > > http://www.dot-biz.com/IPv4/Tutorial/
> > > > http://www.RepliGate.net
> > > >
> > > > The Netfilter Project: Packet Mangling for Linux 2.4
> > > > http://netfilter.samba.org
> > > >
> > > > Jim Fleming
> > > > http://www.IPv8.info
> > > > IPv16....One Better !!
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Charlie Root" <root@IPv8.UNIR.COM>
> > > > To: <jfleming@anet.com>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:45 AM
> > >
>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?049601c18332$513de9a0$1000a8c0>