Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 04:18:01 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is best TCP throughput benchmarking tool? Message-ID: <04f00191-78b8-6c9f-4b6b-fb11d10f91ea@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <1743704969.20181019235034@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <eaf633d0-beb7-d806-7d2e-bfec0beb1e47@FreeBSD.org> <650aa1c7-26db-f463-cb59-8dfe1886c764@grosbein.net> <1743704969.20181019235034@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
20.10.2018 3:50, Lev Serebryakov wrote: >>> Please note, that I'm testing endpoint, not a router, so netmap-based >>> packet generators & receivers is no use for me, unfortunately. >> Try benchmarks/wrk. It works pretty well for speeds lower than 40Gbit/s >> but its version 4.0.2 had its own rough edges demanding a router between TCP endpoints. >> I have not tried its newer versions, though. > Looks like benchmark/wrk is HTTP benchmark, opposite to what I need... Together with nginx, wrk can serve as quick TCP traffic generator/receiver. I've used them in 40G environment with success.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?04f00191-78b8-6c9f-4b6b-fb11d10f91ea>