Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:25:11 +0100 From: Gergely Czuczy <gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>, Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: process killed: text file modification Message-ID: <050751d5-8c4d-b257-7c83-3a9bfb38a86d@harmless.hu> In-Reply-To: <YTXPR01MB01891633D0486547C3E748E3DD3D0@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> References: <5ac94b9a-7ced-9eff-d746-7dddaaeca516@harmless.hu> <1489340839.40576.82.camel@freebsd.org> <FF55DB37-4A6B-4D88-B201-B3BCA1A11E87@FreeBSD.org> <YTXPR01MB01898D49933A82170FCAB7A0DD390@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <YTXPR01MB018944EF4248402AD421D825DD390@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20170317083605.GQ16105@kib.kiev.ua> <YTXPR01MB0189F7147A7C5C5F8C56B2F1DD390@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20170317141917.GS16105@kib.kiev.ua> <D0770019-3EEA-45D2-A751-18DF1B274F90@FreeBSD.org> <YTXPR01MB0189FBB6CF664653C1162936DD390@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20170318032150.GW16105@kib.kiev.ua> <YTXPR01MB0189F47B6A23C10BFE8A85E6DD3B0@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <4642046a-08e6-35af-c76e-c5e306f01e62@harmless.hu> <YTXPR01MB01891633D0486547C3E748E3DD3D0@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2017. 03. 21. 3:40, Rick Macklem wrote: > Gergely Czuczy wrote: > [stuff snipped] >> Actually I want to test it, but you guys are so vehemently discussing >> it, I thought it would be better to do so, once you guys settled your >> analysis on the code. Also, me not having the problem occurring, I don't >> think would mean it's solved, since that would only mean, the codepath >> for my specific usecase works. There might be other things there as >> well, what I don't hit. > I hope by vehemently, you didn't find my comments as nasty. If they did > come out that way, it was not what I intended and I apologize. > >> Let me know which patch should I test, and I will see to it in the next >> couple of days, when I get the time to do it. > I've attached it here again and, yes, I would agree that the results you get > from testing are just another data point and not definitive. > (I'd say this statement is true of all testing of nontrivial code.) > > Thanks in advance for any testing you can do, rick > So, I've copied the patched kernel over, and apparently it's working properly. I'm not getting the error anymore. So far I've only did a quick test, should I do something more extensive, like build a couple of ports or something over NFS?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?050751d5-8c4d-b257-7c83-3a9bfb38a86d>