Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:33:20 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r358411 - head/contrib/sendmail/src Message-ID: <056cfbda-1100-c1d6-15d6-b77cdb14001f@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <bc1fd171-c9d0-f3c6-3667-4eeae07e2c99@FreeBSD.org> References: <202002272202.01RM20j9030410@repo.freebsd.org> <525c9e77-9b86-ba95-ede5-54f3bbbb1aa7@grosbein.net> <bc1fd171-c9d0-f3c6-3667-4eeae07e2c99@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20. 2. 28., Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 20. 2. 28., Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> 28.02.2020 5:02, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> >>> Author: jkim Date: Thu Feb 27 22:02:00 2020 New Revision: >>> 358411 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/358411 >>> >>> Log: Fix style inconsistencies near our OpenSSL 1.1.x patch. >> >> Our Handbook describes how to use stock sendmail with SSL and >> SASL enabled: >> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/SMTP-Auth.html >> >> >> Now we have no openssl 1.0.2 in ports anymore, and sasl support builds with openssl-1.1.1, >> so stable/11 world building breaks due to stock sendmail using >> old 1.0.2 SSL API if one follows noted guide adding to >> /etc/make.conf: >> >> SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include/sasl -DSASL >> SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib SENDMAIL_LDADD=-lsasl2 >> >> For upcoming 11.4-RELEASE to be able to run stock sendmail with >> SSL/SASL please consider merging "OpenSSL 1.1.x patch" to >> stable/11 before the release. >> >> I'm willing to test the change before merge with my stable/11 >> workstation utilizing these features because I'm stuck at >> 11.2-STABLE being unable to upgrade to due to this problem. >> >> Could you please supply me with the diff ready to apply to >> stable/11 or describe how do I make it myself? > > All you have to do is rebuilding security/cyrus-sasl2 with system > OpenSSL, i.e., disable SSL option. I just found that you added the option. X-) The option is quite misleading. You need to fix the port first as some people suggested at the time. Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?056cfbda-1100-c1d6-15d6-b77cdb14001f>