Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 20:44:59 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?) Message-ID: <07345CE5-EE3A-413D-84BC-C9DA63FCBB9E@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20472.51031.308284.775990@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> References: <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org> <20472.51031.308284.775990@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 7, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 16:17:53 -0700, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> = said: >=20 >> BIND in the base today comes with a full-featured local resolver >> configuration, which I'm confident that Dag-Erling can do for unbound >> (and which I would be glad to assist with if needed). Other than = that, >> what integration are you concerned about? >=20 > The utilities (specifically host(1) and dig(1)) are the only > user-visible interfaces I care about. I don't see any need for there > to be an authoritative name server in the base system. So long as the > resolver works properly and does DNSsec validation.... The only reason I want it in the base system is that ports don't cross = build very well, but the base system does. That's a weak +1 for keeping = something in the base system, but I'll be the first to admit it is a = second or third tier argument at best. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?07345CE5-EE3A-413D-84BC-C9DA63FCBB9E>