Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:47:37 +1100 From: Jan Mikkelsen <janm@transactionware.com> To: O. Hartmann <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! Message-ID: <0A1E870C-9DD4-449C-8ECA-A5642FF71A7E@transactionware.com> In-Reply-To: <4F462189.3040106@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4F462189.3040106@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Unix is the original IDE. FreeBSD is a good modern implementation. If you don't think that's enough, you need to say what you're really = looking for, rather than just an IDE. It sounds like you're after an = editor with more general niftiness. Visual Slickedit? On 23/02/2012, at 10:22 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not = even > for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is > written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE > was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated > version in the ports suited our needs. >=20 > Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I > filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. >=20 > I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use > CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried > devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of > configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and > not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. >=20 > devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since = many > of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, > but it is marked "broken" on FreeBSD. >=20 > Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, > I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the > focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, = CodeBlocks > is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. >=20 > Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm > also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity > to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an = IDE > is needed. >=20 > Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. >=20 > Oliver >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0A1E870C-9DD4-449C-8ECA-A5642FF71A7E>