Date: 10 Jul 2002 12:44:57 +0200 From: Marc Recht <marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de> To: Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 1.3.1 patchset 7 not quite ready Message-ID: <1026297898.85611.13.camel@leeloo.intern.geht.de> In-Reply-To: <20020710102904.GA3882@gnuppy.monkey.org> References: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FDA83A@l04.research.kpn.com> <20020710102904.GA3882@gnuppy.monkey.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Heh, it seems to work better under -current too without the funny > SIGUSR1 stuff. That's my suggested platform exploration at this time. ;) Glad to hear it will be supported on -current. > -current seems to be pretty stable enough for my daily use. If anybody > has a different perspective on this, then please speak up. I'm also running -current for my day to day work and IMO it's quite stable. At least after the KSE issues had been solved. And -current need testers. :-) But, there are _issues_ with -current (broken gcc/g++, outstanding libc_r problems, ...). Therefore I think p7 should at least run with -stable, even if it's without HotSpot. Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1026297898.85611.13.camel>