Date: 11 Jul 2002 13:07:55 +0200 From: Marc Recht <marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 1.3.1 patchset 7 not quite ready Message-ID: <1026385676.781.30.camel@leeloo.intern.geht.de> In-Reply-To: <15660.64672.311655.234760@emerger.yogotech.com> References: <20020710234814.GE2394@gnuppy.monkey.org> <15660.64672.311655.234760@emerger.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am Do, 2002-07-11 um 05.33 schrieb Nate Williams: > > 3) The only thing that's left is testing out the signal/exception > > framework (stack yellow/red zoning). Hopefully, that won't > > be completely broken. > > It appears that signals may not be completely working as expected in > -current, so you may have problems there as well. > > If the only problems are userland (ie; libc_r), that's a really silly > reason to abandon -stable for -current. IMHO is targeting -current The Right Thing (tm). 5.0-RELEASE is not _so_ far away and it would be nice if it would come with a native (Sun approved) binary on the CD. IMHO it would be good for the image of FreeBSD. Some users were disappointed that it didn't come with the latest 4.x-RELEASEs. I don't say -stable should be abandoned, but 5.0-RELEASE should (IMHO) be the primary target. Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1026385676.781.30.camel>