Date: 16 Jul 2002 17:22:59 -0600 From: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Eric Anholt <anholt@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients Makefile ports/x11/XFree86-4-documentsMakefile ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries Makefileports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries/files patch-bsdLib.rules patch-drilx11patch-xthreads patch-z01 ports/x11/XFree86-4-manuals Makefile ... Message-ID: <1026861780.474.14.camel@anholt.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <3D34493C.3A23D5C@FreeBSD.org> References: <200207142026.g6EKQXa1003977@freefall.freebsd.org> <3D34493C.3A23D5C@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 10:26, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > I found that after this commit build of XFree86-4-Server builds X11 > libraries as well, which looks to me as a complete waste of time, > since at this point those libraries already installed. Could you > please investigate and fix? Was it not doing this before the commit? I know some things (in the current setup at least) have to be rebuilt in different ports. For example we build and install libGL.so in XFree86-4-libraries, but a lot, if not all, of libGL.so has to be rebuilt to build the DRI client libraries for XFree86-4-Server. One thing I plan to look at though is how to reduce, if possible, the amount of source we are extracting and how much of X we are building each time. One thing people have proposed is having a shared source dir, but I'm not sure how well that would work (And how we would deal with it in relation to things like portupgrade which like to clean after installing the port). -- Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1026861780.474.14.camel>