Date: 08 Sep 2002 14:58:32 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> To: Pat Lashley <patl+freebsd@volant.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CONCLUSION] What to do about Mozilla Message-ID: <1031511512.60099.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <4150422704.1031478579@mccaffrey.phoenix.volant.org> References: <1031382538.46865.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <3703892704.1031440015@mccaffrey.phoenix.volant.org> <1031465323.644.13.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <4150422704.1031478579@mccaffrey.phoenix.volant.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-O7QMEvl6LHYhi5kOfxRB Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2002-09-08 at 05:49, Pat Lashley wrote: > --On Sunday, September 08, 2002 02:08:38 AM -0400 Joe Marcus Clarke=20 > <marcus@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > > ... > > This problem should be fixed now if you make sure the origin pointed to > > in your +CONTENTS file is correct. Both pkg_version and portupgrade > > report no problems on my mozilla laptop, or my mozilla-devel desktop. >=20 > I hand edited the +CONTENTS files, but then after a cvsup and index rebui= ld, > portversion showed my 1.1 mozilla ports as being downrev of the 1.0_2,1=20 > ports. > And when I upgraded the XFree86 ports to 4.2.0 the recursive update=20 > downgraded > my mozilla ports back to 1.0_2,1. >=20 > I had written a section outlining how I was only seeing one copy of the > mozilla ports in the INDEX and what I thought the problem was; but it > turns out that somehow my INDEX.db was noticably newer than the INDEX > itself. I've re-cvsupp'd and re-built the indexes and now I see both. > So I'll retract my claim that the split is unfinished. >=20 >=20 >=20 > But now I've got the old versions installed; and don't see any clean way > to upgrade to the new ones. (I do not consider manual pkg_deinstall and > portinstall to be clean.) I've tweaked the origin in the +CONTENTS files= ; > but that doesn't seem to make any difference at this point. (And is, I > suspect, actually counter-productive.) I have a feeling that no matter > what I do, I'll wind up with both versions installed... Can you explain the "old" and "new" versions. Are you referring to mozilla-embedded-devel and mozilla-headers-devel? If so, I committed a fix yesterday to correct their split. That may be what you were seeing previously. Joe >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -Pat --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-O7QMEvl6LHYhi5kOfxRB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA9e53Yb2iPiv4Uz4cRAig3AKCr1ACujGhvM9NuoySosVWgDQKW2ACeJoLc 5PWXyjXv+fOB2pgWpoGQ1Rk= =aZ8c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-O7QMEvl6LHYhi5kOfxRB-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1031511512.60099.6.camel>