Date: 05 Oct 2002 18:38:46 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: "Adriel Cardenas G." <aztlanet@gmx.net> Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Evolution 1.1.1 (ok!) Message-ID: <1033857526.48812.11.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <1033857388.7217.5.camel@unxstar> References: <20021004224416.Y41592-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1033857388.7217.5.camel@unxstar>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-0ThlWOQ6yXScSB+zR5Gl
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 18:36, Adriel Cardenas G. wrote:
> > > > >> I have seen this problem too on both my 4.7-rc and -current box
> > > > > >> It apears that ldconfig does not remember the diffrent paths a=
fter a
> > > > > >> reboot
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> locate libeutil.so.0
> > > > > >> /usr/X11R6/lib/evolution/1.1/libeutil.so.0
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> when I run as root "ldconfig -m /usr/X11R6/lib/evolution/1.1/"
> > > > > >> evolution starts
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> hope this helps,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I haven't been able to reproduce this. I rebooted my 4.7-RC box=
and
> > > > > >verified that /usr/X11R6/lib/evolution/1.1 was not in the ldconf=
ig
> > > > > path,
> > > > > >then started Evo. It came right up. Tell me, did you build wit=
h pilot
> > > > > >support?
> > > > >
> > > > > Guess what?...same thing happened here, just ran as root...
> > > > >
> > > > > "ldconfig -m /usr/X11R6/lib/evolution/1.1/"
> > > > >
> > > > > and that was it! Evo starts.
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you think we should report this as part of the Evolution beta-=
test?
> > > > > or what this could it be?
> > > >
> > > > I think this should be reported to Ximian. libeutil should be a mo=
dule
> > > > that is dynamically loaded at run time. If it was meant to be a no=
rmal
> > > > shared library, they should install it in ${X11BASE}/lib.
> > > >
> > > > That said, I still can't reproduce this on my -stable machine.
> > > >
> > >
> > > When I installed it, I didn't use the WITHOUT_PILOT argument, therefo=
re
> > > it has the pilot support, probably it has something to do with that.
> >=20
> > That's most likely it. The problem is most likely due to linking issue=
s
> > with the pilot libs.
> >=20
> > >
> > > I'll report it to ximian.
> >=20
> > I've already reported the building problems to Ximian. Hopefully this
> > will go away with the next beta. Please add a bug report, though. Whe=
n
> > you do, include all the errors, the fact that you're building with pilo=
t
> > support, and that all the modules in the evolution directory should be
> > dynamically loaded without needing to be in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Thank=
s.
> >=20
> > As a workaround, I'll probably have to add an RC script to install that
> > directory in the ld cache.
> >=20
> Hi I recently made an portupgrade -ra, and it upgrade this Gnome related
> packages:
>=20
> gdk-pixbuf
> gnomecanvas
> gnomecontrolcenter2
> libgtop
> libogg
> libvorbis
> metacity
> pkgconfig
> sodipodi
>=20
> plus this ones
>=20
> Abiword
> apache2
> fetchmail
> webmin
> xchat2
>=20
> and after the portupgrade I did not have to make the explicit load of
> /usr/X11/lib/evolution/1.1
>=20
> Funny thing, huh?
Doesn't make sense, but I'll keep an eye on it when Evo 1.1.1 goes live.
Joe
>=20
> Adriel
>=20
>=20
--=20
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
--=-0ThlWOQ6yXScSB+zR5Gl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQA9n2n2b2iPiv4Uz4cRAhDsAJ43cWqKf1LOVMfssEOLythOOQ0CAwCfa+WK
0zxYonJbRsBSoWgd+1kIXTo=
=cwgs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-0ThlWOQ6yXScSB+zR5Gl--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1033857526.48812.11.camel>