Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Sep 2003 04:22:15 -0400
From:      Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Michael Collette <metrol@metrol.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD Mailing Lists <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: About that Freetype2 update
Message-ID:  <1064910135.48606.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
In-Reply-To: <200309300115.05714.metrol@metrol.net>
References:  <200309300115.05714.metrol@metrol.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-bZdE5jz6LTnqcBVl1MOh
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 04:15, Michael Collette wrote:
> Marcus,
>=20
> The Freetype2 port itself worked quite nicely.  Upgraded properly, no com=
pile=20
> problems.  I had been looking forward to seeing this get updated due to s=
ome=20
> visual problems with Scribus.
>=20
> Long story short, I uninstalled the new version and added the old one bac=
k in=20
> via a package.  All of my TrueType fonts here got real jaggedy.  They wer=
e=20
> readable, but the quality was seriously degraded.
>=20
> I run with a KDE desktop and no anti-aliasing, as this is a laptop.  AA o=
n an=20
> LCD screen just looks fuzzy.  I should note that with AA turned on, the n=
ew=20
> Freetype2 does just fine.  The not so subtle difference is when there isn=
't=20
> any AA help.
>=20
> I should also note that this was certainly no fix for Scribus.  With the=20
> updated version of Freetype2 I wasn't able to even see any True Type font=
s at=20
> all.
>=20
> Without doing any real investigative work, I'm leaning to one of three=20
> explanations here...
>=20
> 1. Something is goofy in this new version of Freetype2
> 2. Freetype2 reall wanted that byte code interpreter after all
> 3. I need to recompile the applications that depend on Freetype2
>=20
> No major crisis here, as the old version seems to still be doing just fin=
e. =20
> Thought I'd pass along what all I saw with this new one just the same.

Everything here looks beautiful.  You're free to test your assumptions
above.  If the byte-code interpreter helps, I can always add that back
in as an option.

Joe

>=20
> Later on,
--=20
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team	::	gnome@FreeBSD.org
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome

--=-bZdE5jz6LTnqcBVl1MOh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQA/eT03b2iPiv4Uz4cRAg/JAJ9DWxc7xb19blhO3oIqid+Dk6d12ACeLtZd
tc5kjnfLZWTmrJS3so0dk5U=
=dnPx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-bZdE5jz6LTnqcBVl1MOh--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1064910135.48606.6.camel>