Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 01:52:55 +1000 From: Q <q_dolan@yahoo.com.au> To: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD Message-ID: <1066924375.58538.161.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20031023130230.GA2916@stack.nl> References: <20031022082953.GA69506@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1066816287.25609.34.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <20031022095754.GA70026@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1066820436.25609.93.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <20031022144043.GI55642@dan.emsphone.com> <20031022155058.GE3640@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20031022204200.GC14012@splashground.de> <1066865808.42673.28.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <20031023112353.GD14012@splashground.de> <1066910120.58538.15.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <20031023130230.GA2916@stack.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Good point, maybe I should have said "increasing" growth instead of "linear" ;) Seeya...Q On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 23:02, Marc Olzheim wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 09:55:21PM +1000, Q wrote: > > I beg to differ. It might show linear growth, but the OpenBSD graph is > > definitely not O(n). > > Err... How would you define O(n) then ? > > Zlo > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1066924375.58538.161.camel>