Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 2 Jan 2015 04:32:23 -0800 (PST)
From:      "Thomas Mueller" <mueller6724@bellsouth.net>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org 
Cc:        madpilot@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: multimedia/libva fails in configure stage, missing file?
Message-ID:  <106917.74102.bm@smtp112.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
References:  <251934.51704.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <54A074AF.4040709@FreeBSD.org> <100948.14193.bm@smtp119.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <54A1A000.7050807@FreeBSD.org> <92121.6371.bm@smtp115.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <54A32410.9020300@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Unluckily I've been unable to reproduce the failure on my system. Here I
> get all the warnings except automake does not die.

> Could you test some other port which uses automake? For example
> multimedia/libvdpau or textproc/libucl or net-mgmt/collectd5...

> Do these work correctly?

I tried multimedia/libvdpau since it was on the list of ports to be built or updated in connection with png.

It quickly failed on automake.

So I guess automake is not working.

I checked 

pkg info -r automake
and got nothing, likewise nothing for autoconf.

So I wonder why/how it was installed.  I might have done it because it was listed as a requirement for cross-compiling Haiku.

I also wonder how I got so far with the ports prior to this ill sequel to upgrading png.

I see automake is at v1.14.1 upstream, since December 2013.

I'm very surprised how few FreeBSD ports use automake and autoconf, maybe autoconf and automake are used more in Linux?

I have an old 10.0-STABLE installation with no ports/packages built yet, maybe I could try something on that regarding automake and autoconf?

Tom




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?106917.74102.bm>