Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:04:27 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Franz Klammer <klammer@webonaut.com> Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Subject: Re: need your opinion/vote for name of gdesklets... Message-ID: <1069344267.783.28.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <3FBCE303.8060202@webonaut.com> References: <opryv52asf8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <opryv7g9p48ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <opryv9mu0j8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <3FBBA862.3070008@webonaut.com><3FBBBBA6.5010301@webonaut.com> <oprywh92mh8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <20031119212505.GQ40706@toxic.magnesium.net> <20031119230406.001541f1.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <3FBCE303.8060202@webonaut.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-Ehylb0B5ioLhmXHdAPw8 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 10:51, Franz Klammer wrote: > Jeremy Messenger wrote: >=20 > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:04:06 +0100, Alexander Leidinger=20 > > <Alexander@Leidinger.net> wrote: > > > >> On 19 Nov 2003 16:25:05 -0500 > >> Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> > >>> > 1) > >>> > gdesklets-<name>-sensor > >>> > gdesklets-<name>-display > >>> > > >>> > 2) > >>> > gdesklets-sensor-<name> > >>> > gdesklets-display-<name> > >>> > > >>> > Which is better? 1 or 2? Vote.... > >> > >> > >> > >>> I like 2 better. That way, I can easily search for gdesklets sensors = by > >>> doing locate gdesklets-sensor-. > >> > >> > >> That's a very good reason... > > > > > > I agree, #2 is already a winner. > > > >> What's the gdesklet syntax for referring to sensors/displays? Do we wa= nt > >> to change it if it isn't 2)? > > > > > > I am not sure, but I prefer to add 'gdesklets-' for ease to search. In=20 > > gentoo, they do desklet-<name>display and desklet-<name>sensor, no=20 > > space between. In Debian, they put all stuff together in a package and=20 > > name it as gdesklets-data. > > > > I personal think I will go for #2 above. > > >=20 > looks like the standard ist: there is no standard ;-) >=20 > i've now PR'd one of the sensors. but i think the name is too > long if we use gdesklet-sensor-<name> But that's not so bad with PKGNAMEPREFIX and PKGNAMESUFFIX. Of course, this violates the current naming convention. >=20 > eg: gdesklets-sensor-psi_iconbutton >=20 > why we don't think about a 3rd solution: >=20 > display&sensors: gdesklets-<name> > display only: gdesklets-<name> > sensor only: sensor-<name> This could lend itself to namespace conflicts. >=20 > with that solution you will find only desklets with an display. > sensor-only ports should be installed automatically as dependency. > a normal user doen't need to find it and a developer knows how > to search. True. But what's really wrong with the long name? Joe >=20 > franz. >=20 > > Cheers, > > Mezz > > > >> Bye, > >> Alexander. > > > > > > --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-Ehylb0B5ioLhmXHdAPw8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/vOYLb2iPiv4Uz4cRAmdRAJsFyjt6rhbOd8rDk0VQXU7hCUI4kQCfeSRJ GuIIX6FCnO0P+ATdfh/Ly9s= =wnWW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Ehylb0B5ioLhmXHdAPw8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1069344267.783.28.camel>