Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:46:28 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: Davide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org>, Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>, Joe Holden <lists@rewt.org.uk>, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>, FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: polling's future [was: Re: Dynamic Ticks/HZ] Message-ID: <10890.1352198788@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <5098E8B4.5040309@freebsd.org> References: <509758B8.1000409@rewt.org.uk> <CACYV=-HwJ1j2-zDtCtuGNKzdFRJhPsZm6vtFXAVyPSabCXvFEQ@mail.gmail.com> <50975F6F.6010907@rewt.org.uk> <CACYV=-Ef5ij7%2BgqDV9oS3xRyD6Yy2mqDyKqqUZZQ-KsWb_3C3A@mail.gmail.com> <5097898C.9080109@rewt.org.uk> <CAFMmRNwR_XxjnRZvxqew77qNnOTGWrRQnhJkg4u2berL8VCVtw@mail.gmail.com> <20121105163654.GA12870@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <5097E880.8010001@rewt.org.uk> <20121105165748.GA13098@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <5098E526.6070101@freebsd.org> <10806.1352197657@critter.freebsd.dk> <5098E8B4.5040309@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- In message <5098E8B4.5040309@freebsd.org>, Andre Oppermann writes: >> I think it should go away, and if there still is a relevant >> usage segment, be replaced by _real_ "device-polling" which is >> not tied to the network stack. > >Don't we already have the equivalent with a fast interrupt thread >that simply acknowledges and disables the interrupt [...] The point is that not all hardware have interrupt-pacing, so being able to poll at a lower rate in software would save overhead. I'm not sure if the hardware where this applies is still relevant, it would probably be mostly in the embedded space. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10890.1352198788>