Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:13:04 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/64342: Assumed content of PATH is not defined in Porter's Handbook Message-ID: <1093536783.724.0.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <6BCED37A-F72F-11D8-91E7-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> References: <6BCED37A-F72F-11D8-91E7-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 03:13, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > I think it's fair to assume that PATH will be (as it pertains to > > @[un]exec commands, post-install commands, etc.): > > > > /sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin > > > > This is what it is set to during package builds on pointyhat, and is a > > reasonable default. > > PATH is a strange beast, since pkg_add(1) sets it to > > /sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin > > for pkg_req, pkg_install and @exec. pkg_delete(1) just inherits the PATH > given in the environment. I think this should be changed to use the PATH on pointyhat. I don't see any reason why /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin shouldn't be in there. Joe > -Oliver -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBLgwPb2iPiv4Uz4cRAvRgAJ43qteesFN1/K8Am1CsyDmEJtLfPQCfdY8H Ggq9D+YFxZ4jpS3MX1vtrPw= =Ug2Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1093536783.724.0.camel>