Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:15:55 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request feedback for GCONF_SCHEMAS in porting.sgml.. Message-ID: <1095383755.19148.7.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <opsef0mynn9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> References: <opsef0mynn9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-4QKN2jljqLx45ZbjW3uv Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 19:24, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I need some feedbacks for my change in porting.sgml in the 'GConf Schema = =20 > Installation' section about the new GCONF_SCHEMAS. If it doesn't clear =20 > enough, just let me know with the explanation why it is not clear or =20 > whatever. English grammar check would be great too. Thanks! >=20 > BTW: bsd.gnome.mk will be next after this feedback. "...these schema files <tt>%gconf.xml</tt> key files were listed in the port's <tt>pkg-plist</tt>. Since this proved to be problematic, handling of GConf schemas was changed to something similar to that of <a href=3D"http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/p= orting-manpages.html">MAN<i>n</i></a> files. That is, for each schema file= installed by your port, you must have the following listed in the <tt>Make= file</tt>:" How about that instead? Joe >=20 > Cheers, > Mezz --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-4QKN2jljqLx45ZbjW3uv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBSjrLb2iPiv4Uz4cRAgzmAJ9jIHoJPNwo5QrTQdS/U76gn3v+hgCgrIOw 3pcW2m2SSveNliyBtrlQSOI= =iQft -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-4QKN2jljqLx45ZbjW3uv--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1095383755.19148.7.camel>