Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 15:18:25 +0200 (CEST) From: "Julien Gabel" <jpeg@thilelli.net> To: "Tony Shadwick" <tshadwick@goinet.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: syncing sources without cvs and cvsup. Message-ID: <10959.145.248.192.30.1116595105.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> In-Reply-To: <20050520073127.T39659@mail.goinet.com> References: <58a92a8f050520020374baf403@mail.gmail.com> <50571.145.248.192.30.1116581497.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> <20050520073127.T39659@mail.goinet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>> i need to update my freebsd sources to -current but the firewall i'm >>> behind blocks both cvs and cvsup, and ctm is an overkill. >> Just for information, why is CTM an "overkill"? I use it at work for >> the very same problem as described here, and don't see any drawback >> (yet...). > Just a thought here. Is ssh blocked? :) You have a machine on the > outside that you trust? You could do an ssh tunnel out and then point > cvsup to localhost:myforwardedport, could you not? Yes, ssh is blocked. We can just use the web and ftp via a farm of three proxies, which are able to resolve names on the Net. We can't even do that from our workstations or internal servers. So... -- -jpeg.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10959.145.248.192.30.1116595105.squirrel>