Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2023 01:52:49 -0800 From: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> To: "bapt@freebsd.org" <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: poudriere-devel based llvm16-16.0.0.r3 build got: "pkg-static: pkg_checksum_hash_sha256_file(read failed): Is a directory" Message-ID: <10D42B12-CFD2-4832-ABD3-251BB3035F8E@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <444B5B74-8ED0-4276-8489-AD14F039E4CD@yahoo.com> References: <444B5B74-8ED0-4276-8489-AD14F039E4CD@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 5, 2023, at 00:03, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > My poudriere-devel based ports update got: >=20 > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D<ph= ase: package >=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > . . . > =3D=3D=3D> Building package for llvm16-16.0.0.r3 > pkg-static: pkg_checksum_hash_sha256_file(read failed): Is a directory > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/llvm16 >=20 > FYI: This was my first time attempting to build llvm16 > as one of the ports. >=20 > I see that, for example, >=20 > = http://ampere3.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=3D131arm64-default&bu= ild=3Dd0f8db852755 >=20 > reports success with building (and, so, packaging) > llvm16-16.0.0.r3 . I've no clue why the distinction. >=20 > For reference: >=20 > port directory: /usr/ports/devel/llvm16 > package name: llvm16-16.0.0.r3 > building for: FreeBSD CA72_ZFS 13.1-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE-p7 = arm64 > . . . > Poudriere version: poudriere-git-3.3.99.20220831 > Host OSVERSION: 1400081 > Jail OSVERSION: 1301000 >=20 > Of 227 ports, this was the only one to fail to build. > llvm15 and gcc12 were built. >=20 > This was on a HoneyComb (16 Cortex-A72's). >=20 > poudriere-devel is now building ports, targeting main > instead of targeting releng/13.1 . We will see how > that goes building the same 227 ports. >=20 > It will be some time before I'll retest building for > releng/13.1 in order to check on repeatability. >=20 > # uname -apKU > FreeBSD CA72_16Gp_ZFS 14.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #88 = main-n261230-e78dc78e517a-dirty: Wed Mar 1 16:17:45 PST 2023 = root@CA72_16Gp_ZFS:/usr/obj/BUILDs/main-CA72-nodbg-clang/usr/main-src/arm6= 4.aarch64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG-CA72 arm64 aarch64 1400081 1400081 >=20 The build for main also failed. One difference in my build vs. the FreeBSD build servers is the use of BE_NATIVE instead of BE_STANDARD . May be the pkg-plist is mishandled for BE_NATIVE ? =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10D42B12-CFD2-4832-ABD3-251BB3035F8E>