Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 06:18:39 +0000 From: jason henson <jason@ec.rr.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make.conf file & CPUTYPE? Message-ID: <1104214719l.1837l.0l@BARTON> In-Reply-To: <20041226015811.GA98109@xor.obsecurity.org> (from kris@obsecurity.org on Sat Dec 25 20:58:12 2004) References: <Pine.WNT.4.61.0412252006250.3864@Treneq> <20041226015811.GA98109@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/25/04 20:58:12, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 08:17:00PM -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote: > > When I ran 'buildkernel' as well as 'buildworld', I used > > the 'CPUTYPE?=i686' directive in the 'make.conf' file. I was > wondering if > > it is correct to leave it in the 'make.conf' file now that I am > finished > > building a new kernel and updating the system. Would I be better > off > if I > > just removed it, or changed it to 'CPUTYPE=i686'. I assumed that > the > '?' > > was just for the 'buildworld' procedure. > > Setting it with ?= was a bug that was recently fixed. You can cvsup > and continue to set it with =. > > Kris > What happened to march= in make.conf. Has it been depreciated?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1104214719l.1837l.0l>