Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 16:08:36 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ETA for gtk 2.6 in the tree? Message-ID: <1107875316.5917.8.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050208160024.0576514f.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> References: <20050208160024.0576514f.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-ziqZOc9W+gmHSA3AGLEK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Miguel Mendez p=ED=B9e v =FAt 08. 02. 2005 v 16:00 +0100:
> I've been playing with GTK+ 2.6 on my NetBSD box and not only it feels
> faster than 2.4.x but also comes with some new widgets I intend to use
> in my programs. When do you guys plan to import 2.6 into the tree? Are
> there any issues holding the import back?
Next month, together with GNOME 2.10.
Main reason is to save users from two recompilations of all apps (once
for Gtk update, second for GNOME update).
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Traffic collapse starts at rumors of snow in Nice (french riviera)
according to some of my friends :)
-- Will at #angband
--=-ziqZOc9W+gmHSA3AGLEK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBCCNX0ntdYP8FOsoIRAtw6AKDMF08u1Tdrj3W+X798oBS5QhPHHgCghh6X
fi8M1wnptT3gEOoO6Y5c9jk=
=bP0y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-ziqZOc9W+gmHSA3AGLEK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1107875316.5917.8.camel>