Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 19:28:17 -0400
From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
To: "Mikhail T." <mi@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc: gnome@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ${PREFIX}/include/nss/nss
Message-ID: <1128814097.47852.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
In-Reply-To: <200510051413.j95EDBi2038518@blue.virtual-estates.net>
References: <200510051413.j95EDBi2038518@blue.virtual-estates.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-4yJ2yuhJp/NtZUuHDSPT Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 10:13 -0400, Mikhail T. wrote: > Hi! >=20 > I just noticed, that there is nothing under /usr/local/include/nss other > than another nss subdirectory. Fixing this is trivial -- we are only > installing nss headers -- but the impact on the dependant ports may not > be. >=20 > It is still desirable, though, IMHO... Yes, but as you pointed out, it will require changes to the NSS-dependent ports (as well as plist changes to security/nss itself). If you want to test all the ports, and submit a complete patch, that would be great. >=20 > While at it, there is, probably, no need to make the libraries > executable nor to strip them -- use INSTALL_DATA instead of > INSTALL_PROGRAM. I disagree. Shared libraries should be stripped as is done in virtually every other port. Making shared objects executable is not required, through. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-4yJ2yuhJp/NtZUuHDSPT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDSFYRb2iPiv4Uz4cRAhLSAKCOYVHEJV92DHoDDTLCLTmpdTeaDACeJeZT 9ZA0jAHCTUiG/b4H4EIDD2Y= =44w6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-4yJ2yuhJp/NtZUuHDSPT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1128814097.47852.10.camel>