Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:36:22 -0800 From: Frank Jahnke <jahnke@fmjassoc.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: doug@polands.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1 Message-ID: <1131752182.96238.70.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20051111233209.GA16049@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1131749651.96238.50.camel@localhost> <20051111230713.GA1628@xor.obsecurity.org> <1131750571.96238.55.camel@localhost> <20051111232132.GA15846@xor.obsecurity.org> <1131751223.96238.63.camel@localhost> <20051111233209.GA16049@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:32 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > You're trying to do something different: upgrade to > 6.0-RELEASE+security patches instead of upgrade to 6.0-STABLE. If > it's indeed a cvsup server that stopped updating in the 6.0-RC1 > timeframe, neither will work with that server (hence why I asked for > confirmation), but the user wanted the latter, and you gave him the > wrong branch tag. > This may be semantics at this point. Is there really a difference right now between 6.0-RELEASE and 6.0-STABLE? Yes, I understand the difference between the designations, but I cvsuped and built seven days ago, shortly after the release of -RELEASE. Have there really been changes in the snapshot during that time? If so, what? Frank (Kris, sorry for the duplicate...)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1131752182.96238.70.camel>