Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:45:11 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: "Andrew P." <infofarmer@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/88713: New port: archivers/linunace Message-ID: <1131957911.27007.8.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <cb5206420511132343u392cd931i6fb6e88b946ed77d@mail.gmail.com> References: <200511131428.jADESD2s082149@freefall.freebsd.org> <cb5206420511130832h6a5f546dn5cb408c9a2f2cb6f@mail.gmail.com> <1131902517.14917.35.camel@localhost> <cb5206420511130947r4d7d1fb6md3e975affe1df820@mail.gmail.com> <1131904237.14917.37.camel@localhost> <cb5206420511132343u392cd931i6fb6e88b946ed77d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-/ewfa/bpNi+7Q+yR4hn0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andrew P. p=ED=B9e v po 14. 11. 2005 v 10:43 +0300: > On 11/13/05, Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Andrew P. p=ED=B9e v ne 13. 11. 2005 v 20:47 +0300: > > > On 11/13/05, Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > Andrew P. p=ED=B9e v ne 13. 11. 2005 v 19:32 +0300: > > > > > On 11/13/05, Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > > Synopsis: New port: archivers/linunace > > > > > > > > > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > > > > > > State-Changed-By: pav > > > > > > State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 13 14:26:46 GMT 2005 > > > > > > State-Changed-Why: > > > > > > New port added as archivers/linux-linunace (we prefix all linux= binary ports > > > > > > with linux- prefix) > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D88713 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought about it. Didn't know it was mandatory or > > > > > something. So I'm sorry that it comes a bit late, but > > > > > if you want to make it right, you'll have to move the > > > > > port to archivers/linux-unace, change PORTNAME > > > > > to unace and prefix DISTNAME with "lin". > > > > > > > > Ok renamed. > > > > > Thanks and wow, I didn't know that there used to be > > > linux-unace before, and that you maintained it. > > > > Yes. It was for version 2.2 and at one point at time it stopped working > > and no one knew why. So I agreed to delete it. > > >=20 > - Raise PORTEPOCH >=20 > was that really necessary across resurrection?.. > More than a year has passed... Script complained. You can't defy a machine. --=20 Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz> <pav@FreeBSD.org> Every man is as God made him, ay, and often worse. -- Miguel de Cervantes --=-/ewfa/bpNi+7Q+yR4hn0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDeE6XntdYP8FOsoIRAtUMAJ9HU1TXR7ouybZWNkYMPLP/nahmHwCgrex7 zbM6CUKZHi44dgtLQl15Vfw= =DI14 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-/ewfa/bpNi+7Q+yR4hn0--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1131957911.27007.8.camel>