Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:51:10 +0200 From: cknipe@savage.za.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Torn between SCSI and SATA for RAID Message-ID: <1147344670.4463171eb5364@196.22.132.16> In-Reply-To: <20060511104517.GA11619@storage.mine.nu> References: <1147255200.4461b9a0a5e71@196.22.132.16> <df9ac37c0605100912s46bffe8an7c1212c4ca0330e5@mail.gmail.com> <44621529.7050804@netfence.it> <20060511104517.GA11619@storage.mine.nu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting lars <lars@gmx.at>: > I recently read an interesting comparison > on consumer and enterprise grade harddisks: > http://www.seagate.com/content/docs/pdf/whitepaper/D2c_More_than_Interface_ATA_vs_SCSI_042003.pdf This was posted yesterday in responce to my question as well. That document deals mainly with the performance and reliability of the different types of hard drives (i.e. SATA vs SCSI). My questions that I'm posting is not really related towards the performance of the system, it's more towards the capacity of the system... I guess it boils down to the physical hardware... How does everything connect, how to expand systems, and how to run arrays bigger than what one single controller can provide... -- C
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1147344670.4463171eb5364>