Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:46:13 +0100 From: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Jim Capozzoli <saltmiser@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS. Message-ID: <1182357973.10612.2.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20070615214849.F63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20070615183413.GA9693@rot13.obsecurity.org> <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com> <20070615214849.F63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-pFMVRMjxg64gBpSl9rHm Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 21:49 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> UFS and future derivatives are here to stay. > >>=20 > > Yeah, but you know because of how nice ZFS is, a concept of using ZFS > > for /home and UFS for everything else will probably turn into a >=20 > if ZFS will really be so nice i will be making small (50MB) partition for= =20 > /boot files, ZFS on rest. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" 50MB ? Asking for trouble that is. All I've got is a debug kernel, and a backup.. $ du -sh /boot 174M /boot --=-pFMVRMjxg64gBpSl9rHm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGeVnQlcRvFfyds/cRAl9mAJ0csFiZzXXEaZOSBJ5QrewLW7yWPgCgikSs 44/0kTMfmuCyggDkRcJnml0= =M0xt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-pFMVRMjxg64gBpSl9rHm--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1182357973.10612.2.camel>