Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:29:21 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.20 is being merged Message-ID: <1193419761.21743.6.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <20071026155223.GB7312@FreeBSD.org> References: <1193261223.93212.15.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <op.t0rsgwav9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20071026155223.GB7312@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-M3USZpQy89dWEd9deC4u
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Alexey Dokuchaev p=ED=B9e v p=E1 26. 10. 2007 v 15:52 +0000:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 03:27:58PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> > Before anyone ask about why not test in pointyhat first. We did, but =20
> > pointyhat has stability problems so it has missed some ports. We had to=
go =20
> > ahead put in FreeBSD ports tree and we will be working on from there an=
d =20
> > we also will be keeping our eyes on pointyhat logs.
>=20
> I'm worried about PF date coming too soon. Maybe we should extend it
> (say, for a week) so Gnome-related problems can get fixed before the
> deadline?
And what is the freeze designed for other than fixing port problems?
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
On second thought, let's not go to Camelot. It is a silly place.
--=-M3USZpQy89dWEd9deC4u
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBHIiPxntdYP8FOsoIRAiaVAJ9HUnaGkZGzqA9Efw8pTPPW04eP0QCguTaA
wEROP6VE8prceIxYW2HGwic=
=jBOF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-M3USZpQy89dWEd9deC4u--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1193419761.21743.6.camel>