Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 22:07:48 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11? Message-ID: <11a5d41b-109a-434b-e8e0-7ed2826a8cc9@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <46d5cfde-c4ac-ebd0-3c13-2759037621f3@FreeBSD.org> References: <9229d4f7-8466-57b0-c954-117736102bd7@FreeBSD.org> <5755F0D3.9060909@FreeBSD.org> <5759DB79.10205@FreeBSD.org> <3d09497c-136c-e217-154c-ba00e6879c6f@freebsd.org> <20160616005016.A15883@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <d7bef617-70a4-f761-7d09-9413eb720b11@freebsd.org> <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org> <46d5cfde-c4ac-ebd0-3c13-2759037621f3@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --1vE69PTuddsF6K2aBLKHBXRWmR8MWOr01 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="UpTP060a5eFlaxGPseC2BTsTFfVxeNk0F" From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Message-ID: <11a5d41b-109a-434b-e8e0-7ed2826a8cc9@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11? References: <9229d4f7-8466-57b0-c954-117736102bd7@FreeBSD.org> <5755F0D3.9060909@FreeBSD.org> <5759DB79.10205@FreeBSD.org> <3d09497c-136c-e217-154c-ba00e6879c6f@freebsd.org> <20160616005016.A15883@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <d7bef617-70a4-f761-7d09-9413eb720b11@freebsd.org> <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org> <46d5cfde-c4ac-ebd0-3c13-2759037621f3@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <46d5cfde-c4ac-ebd0-3c13-2759037621f3@FreeBSD.org> --UpTP060a5eFlaxGPseC2BTsTFfVxeNk0F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03.08.2016 21:03, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: >> 1/ ability to use keep-state without an implicit check-state. <--- mos= t >> important for me. (store-state)? >> 2/ ability to keep-state without actually doing it <---- less importan= t >> for me. > So, if there are nobody against, I plan to commit this part in a severa= l > days. Which implementation? Just curious, I could live with any, really. --=20 // Lev Serebryakov --UpTP060a5eFlaxGPseC2BTsTFfVxeNk0F-- --1vE69PTuddsF6K2aBLKHBXRWmR8MWOr01 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXokEJXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGOTZEMUNBMEI1RjQzMThCNjc0QjMzMEFF QUIwM0M1OEJGREM0NzhGAAoJEOqwPFi/3EePTdkP/2N8eIsNrSHPKz+f37lrCx+k S53c8c/AJwgtxyoo5YA62tmMBU6YhG5axWolfdI2Ii+5Z93wzL2njVVEhDBX1FUY aIzqrbTV3/gJ1p620W7tVG/WnH9alyKSs7PlXWHTDH0lsAeeqA0yWQP4mWo+VbVD RL7Acmid29nOhcP3F2Ga2FypQlGkTBuFVP4E+0cebUHMOJRhAXpTt3tfFhABUjYq M9AaQRDr5rkzl9EEEG6V5Mz8UIpLwJRRyK3jJSuHDGsnVPeOVwpnYdnclITnn86+ t06blvgtlpnRscMcCcZ4lBxn0taoTFFQHYMckTTtq+xrSCQm7i2iBAl8yD1icB9U kDSFTV7h+E1CFWIokLMX5xDJsvckzbZhIqwGPZQVzDo/hzoiyFllDwYx+LIEasub gzxLRUrAVffVCBtIjjlM3CP1pOWD6n5LaQjFnc0CbIBbpQc3d/OtWo5NgvK49+0A L0MHCfHIS43bq8aRSo1FNx+n0lSvSAb2pq41kmOvsClcOdHAq1iu9PMKyUT2pcYK 70aDkGXDXhkLMUxVDP1NroDrhehXwXdUU3quRLdEmFx1VYYk18DYPU2YbDR40QhH vd+8lbkE5mz55SaeN4z8cRmkKUtXMRLYHUFYJzGeVkBDFfrLItaxA9KfLArLfGdr ud+bHnBQXPnQqtjZJcW7 =LZ5z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1vE69PTuddsF6K2aBLKHBXRWmR8MWOr01--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?11a5d41b-109a-434b-e8e0-7ed2826a8cc9>