Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 16 Dec 2017 13:02:45 -0800
From:      Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
To:        Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com>
Cc:        "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Option vs. flavor?
Message-ID:  <11f773c6-7f69-0a4a-d100-018d40a65f48@rawbw.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOc73CAqp9=-8T8czbhk3CP6B2iftkqdXau10JNzmPUXHF0UXg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <ee10fa7f-9107-1c35-8540-ff34d306865d@rawbw.com> <20171216142849.GL10752@graf.pompo.net> <CAOc73CAe03AuLsgSvw1TfV7Ke9qLvGJtHpqowvF=KPnMOxOjxg@mail.gmail.com> <00619a7a-a812-1eac-bdb7-5cecfb891758@rawbw.com> <CAOc73CAqp9=-8T8czbhk3CP6B2iftkqdXau10JNzmPUXHF0UXg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/16/17 12:42, Ben Woods wrote:
> Is there any reason why you want to avoid the download with the port “make
> fetch”?

To not clog the package builder with huge unnecessary data? Or maybe 
this shouldn't be a concern.

> This should not impact you if it uses subpackages and you just install the
> program with pkg.


But are subpackages already available?


Yuri




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?11f773c6-7f69-0a4a-d100-018d40a65f48>