Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 19:26:20 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Cc: imp@village.org (Warner Losh), liam@tiora.net (Liam Slusser), kdrobnac@mission.mvnc.edu (Kenny Drobnack), Harry_M_Leitzell@cmu.edu (Harry M. Leitzell), security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BPF on in 3.3-RC GENERIC kernel Message-ID: <12085.937675580@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:58:22 PDT." <199909172158.OAA49373@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199909172158.OAA49373@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, "Rodney W. Grimes" writes : >> In message <199909172048.OAA05040@harmony.village.org>, Warner Losh writes: >> >In message <5082.937599515@critter.freebsd.dk> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: >> >: There is a new kid in town if it comes to fortifying your FreeBSD >> >: box: jail(2|8) >> > >> >Is jail(2) in 3.3R? Or just -current? I ask because I had to have >> >different suser tests depending on 3.x and 4.0 in the chflags security >> >patches. >> >> Only current. I have no MFC plans. >> Although it could be trivially done I don't think there currently is >> a market demand for doing so, and I don't have the time anyway... > >I've been waiting for this to MFC so that we could use it through out >our AS. I can't run -current on production servers, I would start >building jails within days of this being MFC'ed. > >There.. some ``market demand''. Yeah, well, that was only half the problem... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12085.937675580>