Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:33:30 +0200
From:      Dick Hoogendijk <dick@nagual.nl>
To:        freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: FreeBSD + ZFS on a production server?
Message-ID:  <1213284810.879.7.camel@westmark>
In-Reply-To: <20080612132527.K5722@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <1a5a68400806080604ped08ce8p120fc21107e7de81@mail.gmail.com> <4F9C9299A10AE74E89EA580D14AA10A61A193E@royal64.emp.zapto.org> <20080612132527.K5722@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 13:37 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:

> for example you can't select per file (or at least - per 
> pseudo-filesystem) if you want no protection, mirrored or raidz.

Isn't it a pity that the fbsd implementation of ZFS lacks such a
feature. Your anti stories of ZFS often show these aspects.
Almost none of your comments on zfs are valid in Solaris.

But hey, what the heck, use what you want. I don't write for SUN, I use
ZFS on all systems and it never disappointed me. It's blazingly fast,
very flexible, configurable. Stripes, mirrors, it's all so easy.
It will be even better in time.

Conclusion: Wojciech Puchar is against zfs. so what. I belong to the
pro's fwiw.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1213284810.879.7.camel>