Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 14:44:27 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> Cc: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP/5.0 performance on single CPU? Message-ID: <12364.1023453867@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 07 Jun 2002 12:50:04 BST." <20020607125004.A83543@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20020607125004.A83543@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>, j mckitrick writes: >| On the other hand, there are numerous new features (GEOM, TrustedBSD, >| OpenPAM, Snapshots + background fsck, etc) being implemented in 5.x that > >Other than devfs (which I haven't investigated yet) it seems most of >these features are extras, not the basics, correct? Other than SMP, of >course. It is the intent that GEOM will be standard (or basics if you like). -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12364.1023453867>