Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 16:10:23 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> Cc: pgollucci@p6m7g8.com, naylor.b.david@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports) Message-ID: <1243174223.18007.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <20090523135133.71a92669@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <20090522.195350.193746535.chat95@mac.com> <20090522164138.236cb114@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <200905231101.59467.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <20090523.182426.193741786.chat95@mac.com> <20090523135133.71a92669@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-V73e7rWxXC08WF38Vt/F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ion-Mihai Tetcu p=ED=B9e v so 23. 05. 2009 v 13:51 +0300:
> > > - MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER defaults (but user defined) to number of cores
>=20
> This part looks OK, I wonder if there's any reason t ain't like this
> now; Pav?
> -.if defined(MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER)
> +MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER?=3D `${SYSCTL} -n kern.smp.cpus`
> _MAKE_JOBS=3D -j${MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER}
> -.else
> -_MAKE_JOBS=3D -j`${SYSCTL} -n kern.smp.cpus`
> -.endif
Wouldn't that mean an evaluation of the backtick command in every
make(1) invocation? That would be highly undesirable.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
See file. Click file. Get file.
--=-V73e7rWxXC08WF38Vt/F
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)
iEYEABECAAYFAkoZVUsACgkQntdYP8FOsoJh9wCfY+aj5m1fAqAf9rkuvqhhpj5r
pHAAnjnXUVWJXLKGGTRkPAR8gMeCP5aU
=gx/h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-V73e7rWxXC08WF38Vt/F--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1243174223.18007.2.camel>