Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 17:07:21 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> Cc: perl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl vendor directory Message-ID: <12CA1FE7-B106-4015-8E07-C8082F3E7BE6@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20160404071742.GH35640@home.opsec.eu> References: <2490D243-A6AF-453A-A7AA-E7246CD57639@gsoft.com.au> <20160404071742.GH35640@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is there a reason _not_ set the vendor variables? If other ports have the sa= me work around it seems like this would reduce the number of modifications o= ver all.. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C > On 4 Apr 2016, at 16:47, Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> wrote: >=20 > Hi! >=20 >> There is a work around (tell ZM to install its perl stuff in the >> site prefix) but it would be nice to not have to do that. >=20 > It's OK to do so, all perl ports do it like that. >=20 > --=20 > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to g= o ! >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12CA1FE7-B106-4015-8E07-C8082F3E7BE6>