Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 11:30:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE3 de facto EOL, Project Trinity? Message-ID: <1318185045153-4885908.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <4E91E1A5.2020809@gmail.com> References: <1318172010503-4885362.post@n5.nabble.com> <4E91E1A5.2020809@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I know, but neither is direct KDE3 replacement, nor does offer "complete user experience" (whatever it means, but I'm thinking of UI consistence mainly). Speaking of lightness, XFCE is memory hungry these days and Linux centric, and Fluxbox is not that light after all. I personally use dwm or mcwm, but it bears none relevance whatsoever. KDE3 was nice in that "DE which is not yet completely blown-out-of-proportions" way :) Thanks for attention. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/KDE3-de-facto-EOL-Project-Trinity-tp4885362p4885908.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1318185045153-4885908.post>