Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:41:41 +0000 From: Gavin Atkinson <gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "Wojciech A. Koszek" <wkoszek@freebsd.czest.pl>, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh Message-ID: <1328892101.38277.88.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgmjQX%2B8hZVdjYBHJfonegavYhY_22gyVszpPvxhAKbvTA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgnebQUY8azv8fovQPkB%2BGgsQjaByZ6JwnNWjrM1hB65eQ@mail.gmail.com> <1328887627.38277.68.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <CAF6rxgmjQX%2B8hZVdjYBHJfonegavYhY_22gyVszpPvxhAKbvTA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 11:25 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > Picking a random email to reply to. > > My goal with this email is to reduce the amount of "controversial" changes. I applaud this. I've often considered doing the same but avoided it because it was easier than fighting the bikeshed :) > commit 3ea4ea3a59d14cb060244618dd89d7dd0170bee1 > diff --git a/etc/root/dot.cshrc b/etc/root/dot.cshrc > --- a/etc/root/dot.cshrc > +++ b/etc/root/dot.cshrc > @@ -7,9 +7,10 @@ > > alias h history 25 > alias j jobs -l > -alias la ls -a > +alias la ls -aF > alias lf ls -FA > -alias ll ls -lA > +alias ll ls -lAF > +alias ls ls -F > > Two people didn't like these changes but didn't explain why. This is > incredibly helpful, especially for a new user. If you dislike the > alias change please explain what bothers you about it? I don't use the first two aliases, so I don't care about them at all. I do however disagree strongly with changing the default options on such a widely used command. This change is disruptive, and it can affect use of ls(1) in scripts. For example, it even sticks the extra characters in the output of "ls -1" (the number 1), which is specifically designed to be used when piping the output elsewhere. Please do not break this. It is also distracting - If I want to see what type of file a particular entry is, why not just run "ls -l"? It's like the tendency some Linux distributions have of "alias mv mv -i", although that can at least be overridden on the command line with "-f". The "ls -F" change cannot be overridden without unaliasing. > if ($?prompt) then > # An interactive shell -- set some stuff up > - set prompt = "`/bin/hostname -s`# " > + set prompt = "[%n@%m]%c04%# " > + set promptchars = "%#" > > Many people had alternative suggestions for the prompt. Can you please > clarify why you believe your prompt should be the _default_ one? I can't comment as I didn't say my suggestion should be default - but for me the above isn't a bad choice. I would however prefer: set prompt = "%n@%m:%c04 %# " and not set prompt = "[%n@%m]%c04%# " as that then gives you user@host:path in exactly the same format as you need to use with scp, etc. > > I use the $HOME/bin on my machines but I am not so sure to make this a general thing. > > Many people expect it, and given that it is the last item in the path > it won't affect all that much. It's been in there forever. I think this should stay, it would just be too disruptive otherwise. Gavin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1328892101.38277.88.camel>