Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 15:51:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Wesley Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org> To: <julian@elischer.org> Cc: <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>, <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: KSE status report Message-ID: <13302.148.175.49.1.1025639460.squirrel@www.chemikals.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207020912391.95531-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <200207021106.aa15257@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207020912391.95531-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
After reading this... I got to thinking, and I copied the old headers into the wrong place. After rebuilding, it works fine :)... That's what I get for doing it at 2am! My fault, you guys could have fixed this almost immediately except for some bad info from me. > Good idea. > > Unforunatly someone tried to complie a libc_r with the old queue.h and > it had the same problem (or so they said). > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Ian Dowse wrote: > >> In message >> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207020054590.94626-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju >> lian Elischer writes: >> >The big problem at the moment is that something in the >> >source tree as a whole, and probably something that came in with KSE >> >is stopping us from successfully compiling a working libc_r. >> >(a bit ironic really). >> >> Is the new >> >> (elm)->field.tqe_next = (void *)-1; >> >> in TAILQ_REMOVE a likely candidate? That could easily tickle old bugs >> in other code. The libc_r code does use a lot of TAILQ macros. >> >> Ian >> > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13302.148.175.49.1.1025639460.squirrel>