Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:29:09 +0100 From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@rocketmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Installing 9.1 without re-partitioning hard drive Message-ID: <1363620549.604.85.camel@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303180859370.17241@wonkity.com> References: <20130317153744.DEQ57782@ms5.mc.surewest.net> <1363594543.1496.69.camel@archlinux> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303180859370.17241@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 09:00 -0600, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Standard practice for this list is to Cc the responder and the list, > because people are not required to subscribe to post. That makes sense and does explain why my last mail came through the list, while my broken MUA didn't use the address, I used to subscribe to this list. So a smarter MUA should provide different reply settings for replying to different lists. I should take a look at the mailman settings, since at the moment I receive 2 mails in case of Cc'ing, IIRC this can be disabled.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1363620549.604.85.camel>