Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 27 Oct 2013 22:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Laszlo Danielisz <laszlo.danielisz@yahoo.com>
To:        "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   mount smbfs on boot
Message-ID:  <1382939871.20721.YahooMailNeo@web160504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

Yesterday I spent quite many hours figuring out what is wrong.

Every time my fbsd 9.2 boots up I have the following error:

Mounting late file system: smb_co_lock: recursive lock for object 1
mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Authentication error

In fstab I have the following line for samba:
//laci@UBUNTU/LACI/mnt/smbfssmbfsrw,late,-N,-I192.168.1.2300


And /etc/nsmb.conf looks like this, I also tried moving under /root/.nsmbrc and everybody can read it.
[UBUNTU:laci]
addr=192.168.1.23
password=*******

Of course I checked the password couple time, I have the correct password in the configuration file.


Do you have any idea what should I check?
Thx!
Laci
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 28 09:17:38 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFA62F9
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:17:38 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jbirch@jbirch.net)
Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com (mail-oa0-f53.google.com
 [209.85.219.53])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A39372D66
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:17:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id n12so3216713oag.26
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=j5ouKEldTV/LEfTGnjLkqW4T4VrRYBQI6XQFftrJcxU=;
 b=QHkpnFrhwMIcrc/2LUsYbjEIuSAwIcXLhde3Sd0/NsxrT0SlO5SRFmo5hgs8OQOJox
 PyyQuL9MEOL8t3frF0rGXIpUPVpEJDP6SEao5LWg9sfxmKzq20VS1R0ncVQsiiwEhrDe
 hdOzQ+R2iYk6b8oKvJbjqhzDOfUiojeReWI5qr9eP3/370ViKVIVC3BWxS/NBfjygrWJ
 0R/1IUTTVSQx4u/IvTPm+rP4shEa8d8t7WCC+HziqPojvHyy7Y9KUsvsea6L/NlaPNj8
 k0S7/hMXBHazWBXWTCL7Ou83eCpKCpMPGmFx72DRl5bXvjJY4fN5ldMc2AftAnD1jE5n
 2Mvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQklCvC/9seW4dPCgOJobCC+b22aQMVzFZJnPbxlszK6DplnTWNgRRttpXqfhdlVCMcbsYSb
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.125.161 with SMTP id mr1mr32399obb.75.1382951852489;
 Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.185.71 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [49.180.138.218]
In-Reply-To: <CAHHBGkpgLQBhfF3qV09m5ANAggcLyMeZO9_ig3iMz-VMJ-Vx2A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA=KUht4Kyz=-J6yGJdPfO4Bnr0a8-qU8k_Aj2Gp0MKjjPM=Qw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHHBGkpgLQBhfF3qV09m5ANAggcLyMeZO9_ig3iMz-VMJ-Vx2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:17:32 +1100
Message-ID: <CAA=KUhuHT8c=T3p8ihszrhvAHxm-X0XzqcaXAnO-OX_UsOhULw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel/World/Ports compilation within jails;
 targeting many platforms.
From: Jason Birch <jbirch@jbirch.net>
To: "illoai@gmail.com" <illoai@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:17:38 -0000

Thanks for your response, illoai.

I think you're getting at what I really need -- jails aren't needed because
I'm not really worried about isolation of services or processes, I just
want to logically separate some code such that compilations are repeatable
and performed similarly.

Whether I do this in chroots that make all compilations look the same, or
just keep separate source trees for each of my builds, is then just a
matter of taste, I guess.


On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 7:45 AM, illoai@gmail.com <illoai@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 26 October 2013 06:53, Jason Birch <jbirch@jbirch.net> wrote:
> > Is it considered 'good form' to do compilation for other machines,
> > architectures, and FreeBSD versions within jails?
> >
> > As a concrete example, my 'main' system is a FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE amd64
> > system, and I would like to compile FreeBSD 11-CURRENT for my BeagleBone
> > Black (ARMv7). Does it make more sense to create a jail environment on my
> > 9.1-RELEASE machine to do all compilation and 'staging' for the
> BeagleBlack?
> >
> > Originally I had just compiled gcc targeting arm and checked out sources
> > into a location that wasn't /usr/src/. This is simple enough for one
> > different target, but I'm wondering if I'll be a little bit more sane if
> > I've got a jail for each individual target I'm compiling for. Each jail
> can
> > then be set up with one, consistent compiler and source tree in the same
> > location -- even if the compiler (GCC/Clang) and source (X-RELEASE vs
> > Y-STABLE vs CURRENT) differ between targets?
> >
> > Are this a sane thing to be doing? For those of you that have several
> > FreeBSD targets but do most of your set up on a single machine, how do
> you
> > logically separate your 'worlds'?
>
> Your system sounds a bit involved.  FreeBSD is designed to be
> cross compiled fairly easily.
>
> For building wine on amd64, I just created an i386 chroot.
> A jail is targeted at running services within a chroot-like
> environment, I suppose it could be used to cross compile.
>
> You can cross build with:
> # make buildworld TARGET=arm (you may need to specify TARGET_ARCH=
> as well with ARM, I don't know)
>
> You might have to specify CC= CXX= & CPP=
>
> In the case of TARGET=i386 it places the object files under
> /usr/obj/i386.i386/, I'd assume something similar for ARM.
>
> You'll also have to build a kernel.  You'll have to do other stuff, too.
>
> There's stuff here:
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/A_Brief_Guide_To_Cross_Compiling_FreeBSD
>
> --
> --
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1382939871.20721.YahooMailNeo>