Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 14:24:30 -0700 From: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> To: George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org, postmaster@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: freebsd-arm description? Message-ID: <1385414670.1220.21.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> In-Reply-To: <7DCF72F0-4072-46DD-A3F7-F33FC10055E9@neville-neil.com> References: <D8D11C17-21CE-4F90-BC6E-7991BC6B21F2@freebsd.org> <7DCF72F0-4072-46DD-A3F7-F33FC10055E9@neville-neil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 16:07 -0500, George Neville-Neil wrote: > On Nov 25, 2013, at 16:05 , Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > > According to this page: > >=20 > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > >=20 > > =B4[This mailing list] is for individuals actively working on > > porting FreeBSD to the StrongArm Processor.=A1 > >=20 > > How do we change that to something a bit more accurate? > > (I=FFve recently heard from someone who passed over > > this mailing list because they didn=FFt think it applied to > > more modern ARM processors.) > >=20 > > Maybe: > >=20 > > =B4This is a technical mailing list for people working to > > develop and support FreeBSD on various ARM > > processors and SOCs.=A1 > >=20 >=20 > +postmaster@ >=20 > I think they can do this. >=20 > Best, > George >=20 It might be better to say "systems" or "computers" in place of SOCs. Our focus historically has been on the chip/SoC, but increasingly ARM processors are finding their way into off-the-shelf retail computers. -- Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1385414670.1220.21.camel>