Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 10:34:18 -0600 From: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> To: Stepan Dyatkovskiy <stpworld@narod.ru> Cc: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com>, freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Compilation for ARM Message-ID: <1402677258.20883.235.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> In-Reply-To: <539B24DB.4090005@narod.ru> References: <53935D02.2030604@narod.ru> <6D7645D2-9C08-4B5D-BAA5-5B6EC8F66F0B@kientzle.com> <5393FF7B.4020407@narod.ru> <1402428857.20883.177.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <5398B1A2.3010007@narod.ru> <1402591005.20883.213.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <539A2261.4070705@narod.ru> <539A62E2.20003@narod.ru> <1402676121.20883.231.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <539B24DB.4090005@narod.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 22:20 +0600, Stepan Dyatkovskiy wrote: > Hi Ian, > Yup. I have done it with default options. That works fine. Thanks! > > But, currently we need to compare launch times for kernel that was > compiled with cortex-a9 options and for kernel that was compiled with > cortex-a15 options. > > The reason of doing that is some improvements in clang backend that > promises faster execution for (-mcpu=cortex-a15). So we would like to > check it on FreeBSD kernel, since we going to use this OS as base for > our applications. > > -Stepan I wonder if it is upset that the nesting is backwards, like NP_ENTRY(btext) ASENTRY_NP(_start) ... END(btext) END(_start) Maybe try switching the order of the END macros? If that doesn't help, try removing the btext macros completely, I don't think they're needed by anything these days. -- Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1402677258.20883.235.camel>