Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 09:57:14 -0700 From: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Build-UFS-image #599 Message-ID: <1417885034.1064.83.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> In-Reply-To: <7A7677F9-AD1B-436C-9A49-054F7CD6BBC4@FreeBSD.org> References: <1052304530.8.1417827164793.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> <D290A7DA-0AED-4810-A1B1-470E35542292@gmail.com> <7A7677F9-AD1B-436C-9A49-054F7CD6BBC4@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2014-12-06 at 16:01 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > [trimmed CC list to -current] >=20 > On 06 Dec 2014, at 04:59, Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2014, at 16:52, jenkins-admin@freebsd.org wrote: > >=20 > >> See <https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/Build-UFS-image/599/> > >=20 > > I=FFm not entirely sure why the "could not determine COMPILER_TYPE" = error popped up, but I have a couple of questions/concerns related to the= makefile snippet. > > 1. Does it make sense to check CC when running make install? >=20 > Yes, of course it makes sense, if parts of the install depend on e.g. > COMPILER_TYPE. In some cases, you will have to run ${CC} to determine > what it is, specifically if it is just "cc". >=20 >=20 > > 2. Why isn=FFt this value determined once in Makefile.inc1 (per buil= d phase), then passed down from there >=20 > Because you are supposed to be able to build stuff in a subdirectory, > without invoking the full top-level Makefile infrastructure. The actua= l > infrastructure is in share/mk/bsd.*.mk, in fact. >=20 >=20 > > (I=FFve already considered the scenario where someone explicitly sets= CC in a non-toplevel Makefile, which is a problem, but an outlier rather= than the norm)? AFAICT, it gets recomputed for every recursive make, whi= ch contributes to useless forking for something that honestly doesn=FFt c= hange all that often/at all. >=20 > This is indeed a pity, and if you know a better solution, let's hear it= , > please. :-) >=20 >=20 > > At EMC/Isilon at least, we set CC/CXX=3Dfalse when running make dist= ribute*/installkernel/installworld to catch logic errors with rebuilding = code. Should this be in FreeBSD? >=20 > Not sure what that is meant to achieve. If parts of the installation > depend on the value of CC, why would you want to set it to false? Just > so it can error out at those points? >=20 > -Dimitry >=20 I suspect it's to prevent building during the install phase, because doing so is astonishing. I was astonished the other day when it happened. I would be much happier if it had just errored out. -- Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1417885034.1064.83.camel>